Stuntman707 Posted February 15, 2019 Report Share Posted February 15, 2019 So this article came up about Thorpe objecting to a nearby retirement development because the new residents would complain about the noise. I guess they are objecting to this to cover themselves legally in the future if this development went ahead? It could well interfere with Thorpes future development plans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GetEchoes Posted February 15, 2019 Report Share Posted February 15, 2019 Personally don’t see this impacting at all. Thorpe is established and been there too long for a new development (which would of been aware of the site before construction) causing issues with future attractions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuntman707 Posted February 15, 2019 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2019 I just think they're covering themselves though by being able to say "We objected" if new residents do move in next door and complain about noise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glitch Posted February 15, 2019 Report Share Posted February 15, 2019 42 minutes ago, Stuntman707 said: I just think they're covering themselves though by being able to say "We objected" if new residents do move in next door and complain about noise. Yep. Spot on, just think of Towers local residents and these future lot won't be bribed by free tickets. TBF Thorpe is quite loud, if the winds heading in the correct direction, I can hear the screams of joy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.