Apologies to everyone after OP whose posts I have just skipped, but I feel the unrelenting need to inform you Will that your opinions are just fundamentally flawed in every way possible.You've got to try and understand how these Businesses work, and make no mistake that’s what they are. Sure the park owners, particularly at small family run parks like Oakwood (which is one of the best theme parks in the country, by the way) put a bit more heart and soul into the business, but essentially they are there to make money. Nothing more nothing less.Therefore, they aren't about to rip out a perfectly functioning ride which people enjoy, just because it could be replaced with something which you deem, in your opinion, to be better. A replacement ride is neither simple nor cheap. Millions of pounds to any firm no matter size or nature of business is just not cheap. It isn't just the ride either, it has to be marketed, it has to be built, and it comes with different operating costs. If you're removing an old attraction then that has to be taken down, the ground has to be levelled, the old ride has to be disposed of. It's just nowhere near as simple or 'cheap' as you seem to think it is.Thirdly, stop suggesting the Merlin just buy every theme park in the UK that goes into receivership, which is just ridiculous. Why purchase another park which will just compete with the attractions you already run? Surely it would be more beneficial to have a competitor removed from the market and the people that would have previously visited that park to visit one of your current attractions? Then you don't have to purchase a failing enterprise, don't have to invest in it and don't have to compete with yourself.Also, you can't just 'get investors’; it just doesn't work like that! Especially if you're a failing business with mountains of competition, people aren't going to want to invest large amounts of money because it's extremely high risk.Phew, I’m done for now.