I think with Thorpe there has obviously been a relatively short period of substantial investment and in some areas the park have gone for quantity over quality. The age group that the park is aiming towards are not known for their love of theming and want for attractions to heavily feature a storyline etc. Highly themed rides would no doubt lower the number of rides we have in the park today. For instance instead of Rush & Slammer in one year, you could have one or the other highly themed. Thorpe can't afford to drop overall park capacity, I think we all accept that.Theming Samurai, or any such other ride for that matter won't improve its capacity - and if they did theme it, it would probably retain the same re-ride factor and satisfaction rating among your core target audience - therefore wasting cap-ex.It's interesting you bring Chessington up - because I'd say the ride looks as much like a 'travelling funfair ride' at Thorpe than it did at Chessington. Would you have the same opinion of the ride if it hadn't have been moved? It's certainly a step up from the ride it replaced, yes?It may sound like I'm trying to discount your opinion, I'm not - it just needs to be acknowledged that the park is moving forward using the most cost efficient technique to ensure the highest park-wide capacity. And again, this doesn't make your opinion invalid - but sometimes the bigger picture has to come into play.