Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thorpe Park Mania Forums

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Mark9

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mark9

  1. I quoted your whole post because.. well I can. Thing is, I Disagree. B&M have proved that they can cater the hyper to smaller sizes, take Hollywood Dream at Universal Japan. That's a maximum height of 144 feet and takes many of its air time hills just above pathways and buildings. Thorpe, if they wanted, could easily ask for it to be similar height to The Swarm, make the trains shorter and then woolah, you've got a mega coaster. B&M are not against shortening trains or fitting into tight spaces either, take Dæmonen with its six row floorless trains or the way it was wedged into Tivoli Gardens. The thing with Universal and Busch is that it doesn't hold much weight. Universal built Rip Ride Rockit which does intrude on that side of the park, Busch Gardens (I know you specified Tampa, but I'm talking the company in general) have the stylised Apollos Chariot or Kumba and Sheikra. Even Disney has the high rides but it has the dollars to build a ridiculous amount of theming to hide the height. They even sold Expedition Everest on the back of its expensive installation costs. The Sore thumb. Mack can surprise you. Back in 2009, no one thought Blue Fire would be able to be as fantastic as it could be and there is absolutely no reason why they couldn't build a mega coaster if they were asked to. Afterall, rides with air time are in vogue at the moment, the success of Shambhala, Leviathan, Intimidator305 and the likes of Piraten won't have gone a miss.
  2. The difference is Matt, Thorpe has had the Lions share of the investment over the last ten years whilst Chessington has been left to crumble into the state its become. It's all coming to a head this season. Ironically, the one year where they get a new attraction and good weather is the year that Runaway and Rameses becomes SBNO. If it was at Thorpe, it wouldn't matter if Flying Fish spent a year out but because it's Chessington where Runaway is one of the higher capacity attractions (at 650 pph), having it closed has a major knock on effect. Of course, I'm not saying its just Runaway, it's a culmination of Vampire being condemned to two trains, lower attendance's when the park opened in March leading to budget cuts through the rest of the year and a park that is basically falling to its knees. What they really need to do is get a high capacity rollercoaster like Pegasus or Juvelen in, a ride which gobbles through people but the park won't do that so it's a waste of time going down that road and even if it did get one of those rides in, it would be run so dismally that queues would be two hours long and it wouldn't help in anyway. Talking about Chessington just brings people down in other words, lets discuss a park that gives a toss like Thorpe or Europa Park.
  3. Wow. Not even the busy (Or what I would have considered busy rides back in 2005) rides done. Crazy.
  4. Very busy is my best bet. Last few days of school holidays, potential of good weather. Perfect recipe for busy.
  5. Boring, rubbish looking ride. Colour me not interested in these inverting woodies.
  6. SO FIT! (Thanks to Theme Park Collective)
  7. When's Batman going backwards out of interest?
  8. Mark9 replied to Dan9's topic in UK Attractions
    Go. To. Chessington. (Or not as it isn't open, go to Alton Towers for Ripsaw)
  9. Mark9 replied to Sheepie's topic in UK Attractions
    Rule 1. Chessington Lies.
  10. I was thinking more Vietnam personally.
  11. Mark9 replied to Dan9's topic in UK Attractions
    Me to. Come on Thorpe, give us what we really want.
  12. The majority of The Swarm and The Smilers costs comes to the construction process. The Swarm costs more in that figure because of the infilling of the lake. Arguably, The Swarm is much more of a quality product then The Smiler so whilst Smiler is already starting to age (not to mention its frequent bouts of closures), The Swarm feels as smooth as it did on open day and has never had a full day closed.
  13. Colour scheme is the best part of this ride. And that is no criticism of the ride.
  14. Mark9 replied to Sheepie's topic in UK Attractions
    You mean that really warm part of America that regularly sees temperatures well into the 30's? Chessington would argue that air on on Tomb would be a waste of money but then upkeeping their rides would also be seen as a waste of money so you-know, va la voom.
  15. Mark9 commented on JoshC.'s blog entry in The C. View
    My favourite part of that growth is the jump in attendance at Towers thanks to Nemesis
  16. Less talk, MORE TRIP REPORT!
  17. Mark9 replied to th13teen's topic in UK Attractions
    It's been that way for years.
  18. Happy Birthday Big Dipper
  19. That looks so awesome. I swear two days ago there was only the station and a bit of the immelman track and then suddenly, bam, its nearly finished. Very fast construction! Probably but lets not forget that The Swarm is still a great ride. The wing rider should evolve as more parks get their holds on one. I'm not sure it looks better, it certainly looks tidier though.
  20. Fantastic video, thanks to Theme Park Worldwide for hosting the video. It's a rather telling video and there are a few points that really strike me from it. -His love for Megafobia and wooden rollercoasters in general. He quite rightly should be proud of Megafobia, one of the under-rated gems in the UK. It says a lot about him as a person that he prefers rides to be about adventures of experiences and not flash in the pan marketing speil. - His dissatisfaction working on the Smiler. It speaks volumes that a ride creator prefers his 19 year old rollercoaster because of the values it was built upon. Not to be the highest or the biggest but to be the best it could be. Merlin could learn a few lessons from that. - His respect for people like Candy Holland and the way the Smiler was marketed. Clearly, Merlin has some amazing staff that just aren't allowed to reach their limits because of silly rules from up above. - Marketing gets in the way of brilliance. When he describes Saw the ride as successful from IP more then ride, it really says a lot about the way the company is run. Especially when he talks fondly of Thirteen working (one remembers that rides open day very vividly), you can see that John Wardley thinks of a ride as more then just the ride hardware but every element that goes into it. I've so much respect for him. He speaks so candidly and honestly in that interview and you can't help but feel the what if's when you listen to him.
  21. It used to be two adults maximum per car, so thats something Chessington has sorted out slightly. Does that rule still apply on Rattlesnake, as it did the last time I went to Chessington.
  22. I wasn't mightily impressed with this project at first. Then you see track and you suddenly think "Heide Park visit 2014"
  23. The problem is they are running rides on full capacity. How can Vampire run three trains for example if the third train no longer exists. The Toadies 3 car thing is a blinder though. Truckers crashes frequently, does that mean it should only run one Truck per cycle. Man, Chessington's gone to the dogs.
  24. Mark9 replied to Dan9's topic in UK Attractions
    It's bollocks (Excuse my French). The ride runs perfectly safely on three trains and it's down to cost cutting (maintaining three trains costs more then maintaining two) that the third train has been canablized.
  25. The difference being that without fastrack, the queue moves at a consistent rate so whilst it may be physically longer, psychologically it feels shorter.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.