Jake C Posted December 29, 2008 Report Share Posted December 29, 2008 Should have gone to the SouthParks meetup on the 14th and had an all-day wristband for £6! I do expect Saws drop to be a lot more intense.I think I was over exagerating abit shikra or milenum force is my faverouit drop but still pretty intense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Posted December 29, 2008 Report Share Posted December 29, 2008 For a seaside park, AI is immense! The rides are all worth going down for (Dragons Claw... *shivers*), the theming is exceptional and Over the Hill is one of my favorite dark rides, after Hex.I'd reccomend the park to anyone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidders Posted December 29, 2008 Report Share Posted December 29, 2008 the theming is exceptionalHave you seen Rage? There's no them at all; it's the most garishly coloured coaster I've ever seen and it's supports are a worse eyesore than the inside of X:\No Way Out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan9 Posted December 29, 2008 Report Share Posted December 29, 2008 Have you seen Rage? There's no them at all; it's the most garishly coloured coaster I've ever seen and it's supports are a worse eyesore than the inside of X:\No Way Out.What, you mean....wait for it.....pitch black? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidders Posted December 29, 2008 Report Share Posted December 29, 2008 No, I mean the actual track and the dirty floor with the dusty and ugly effects etc.Like this: What a dish... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Posted December 29, 2008 Report Share Posted December 29, 2008 Have you seen Rage?Have you seen Over the Hill? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheepie Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 *Tries to drag this topic back into relevance*So What do people think of the reccent pictures of the exterior station facade? Obviously can't really tell too much from the pictures but it looks very indrustrial and has a particularly sinister feel to it.Been thinking (uh oh we're all in trouble), at what stage do people think the whole Saw concept came into the equation? I'd hope it's been talked about from day one and those early concept art images were literally just "mock" ones incase the deal with Lionsgate fell through. Who knows (Thorpe). Maybe something to ask in the questions thread?Meh, I tried Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rollerross11 Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 I have no idea but yes its gone more industrail than sawmill which doesn't make it fit in canada that good.Also you guys who are complaining about bits a bobs sticking out well u no there not finished yet!!Lets hope to see what 2009 will bring us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jason10 Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 I don't think people understand. Saw isn't part of Canada Creek at all. Thorpe even said this. It is a ride on it's own island with it's own area. It is totally detached from Canada Creek. The name 'Canada Creek Coaster' is merely a name given to it so people know roughly where it is. This was all said by Thorpe themselves! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidders Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 According to the Park Map, SAW is in the vacinity of Canada Creek at the current moment in time, so whether or not it's going to be a new area in 2009 no-one knows yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshC. Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 If you look HERE then you will realise Thorpe are saying it will be in CC for ease for them to locate. It is pointless creating a whole new area for one attraction and one shop that can't expand (as it is on a island) and it is pointless changing CC into a theme which is too strong to keep going for many rides. It is also pointless shoe-horning it in with CC to make it 'fit in'.Therefore, the ride will be in CC, but with no actual relevance to CC, but to just make it easier for the staff to loacte. Got it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 Makes it easier for the guests to locate, I'm sure staff know where an attraction is without needing to know area names. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan9 Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 Well because Saw is located out of Canada Creek, it wouldn't actually help guests that much, especially if they were heading in from Ranger County. Generally a better thing to say would actually just be 'between Colossus and Samurai'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammersley Posted January 2, 2009 Report Share Posted January 2, 2009 First Post on this topic in 2009! WOOP! I'm looking forward to it. I had an idea bout the area, do you think they will have like characters such as guy on the bike riding around, like musical ruth at towers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Posted January 2, 2009 Report Share Posted January 2, 2009 According to the Park Map, SAW is in the vacinity of Canada Creek at the current moment in time, so whether or not it's going to be a new area in 2009 no-one knows yet.The areas are no longer stated on the park map.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake C Posted January 2, 2009 Report Share Posted January 2, 2009 or the website. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d.m.k Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 I think its quite a good idea to get rid of the areas, I can't stand them personally, at Thorpe it seems a bit tacky, without them is fine :rolleyes:And in response to the idea about characters from the films being around the area, I think this would be a great opportunity and worth taking on Thorpe's behalf. Jigsaw's Doll on the bike would be a good idea and maybe some bloodied up people running around, but then this would probably have to be age restricted, posing a problem...I know it sounds harsh on under 15's, but I would love to see it have that certificate for the ride and surrounding area because then at least the ride/station/area could be a little more extreme, rather than having to be limited cause there could be young children around. Thorpe Park are solidly in the "thrill park" status and I would like to see a little more "thrill" from this ride and less family friendliness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 I think its quite a good idea to get rid of the areas, I can't stand them personally, at Thorpe it seems a bit tacky, without them is fineThey haven't removed the areas though, each area still exists, its just rather than classifying the rides into areas on the map, they classify them into levels of thrill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phyciodes Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 I know it sounds harsh on under 15's, but I would love to see it have that certificate for the ride and surrounding area because then at least the ride/station/area could be a little more extremeTbh theres only so far the themeing can go until some riders may start to find it uncomfortable and not enjoy the experience. I think a sign at the entrance giving a vague idea of some of the themeing involved and how it may not be approporaite for some guests would work fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan9 Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 I think its quite a good idea to get rid of the areas, I can't stand them personally, at Thorpe it seems a bit tacky, without them is fine :rolleyes:And in response to the idea about characters from the films being around the area, I think this would be a great opportunity and worth taking on Thorpe's behalf. Jigsaw's Doll on the bike would be a good idea and maybe some bloodied up people running around, but then this would probably have to be age restricted, posing a problem...I know it sounds harsh on under 15's, but I would love to see it have that certificate for the ride and surrounding area because then at least the ride/station/area could be a little more extreme, rather than having to be limited cause there could be young children around. Thorpe Park are solidly in the "thrill park" status and I would like to see a little more "thrill" from this ride and less family friendliness.I agree with what Iskander said, just a warning that some theming may disturb or be not suitable for some guests would do fine, instead of casting out hundreds of guests wanting to ride.And getting rid of the areas would destroy the atmosphere that is left, and turn Thorpe into a rides plonked into the ground type of park. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshC. Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 And in response to the idea about characters from the films being around the area, I think this would be a great opportunity and worth taking on Thorpe's behalf. Jigsaw's Doll on the bike would be a good idea and maybe some bloodied up people running around, but then this would probably have to be age restricted, posing a problem...I know it sounds harsh on under 15's, but I would love to see it have that certificate for the ride and surrounding area because then at least the ride/station/area could be a little more extreme, rather than having to be limited cause there could be young children around. Thorpe Park are solidly in the "thrill park" status and I would like to see a little more "thrill" from this ride and less family friendliness.I think that it isn't a good idea having the entire area not suitable for under whatever. For families, it would mean having to drop their children off too far from them, and that could cause distress for parent and child - espically with how the world is today.Also, having all that theming would be costly - espically with actors. I think the queue will have plenty of theming - and too much theming would be bad.(P.S. The ride WILL be suitable for at least 12 and overs - or else they wouldn't be able to enter the Ride it First competition.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 The ride WILL be suitable for at least 12 and overs - or else they wouldn't be able to enter the Ride it First competitionThat might not be true as Stealth Ride It First you had to be 16 to enter..2. Entrants must be 16 years of age or over. Entrants under 18 years of age will require parent(s)/guardian(s) consent to accept a prize and be accompanied by a parent/guardian. The draw is open to UK residents only, excluding employees of The Tussauds Group and their immediate families, their agents, contractors or consultants or anyone professionally connected with the draw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4n Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 I think the point he was making was that if 12 year olds can enter the first to ride competition then they'll definitely be able to ride. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigsaw2009 Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 Let the game begin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4n Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 I SAW these photos on Towers Times earlier, they're quite good. It'll be scary as hell going down that drop now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.